[QUOTE="Heatman,  post: 13830, member: 10"]Whoever calls sees a boxer as a wrestler is a drunk and high on weed because there's no relationship between them in any way. In boxing, the rules are completely different compared to wrestling. Boxing goes on for 12 rounds while there's nothing like that in wrestling.[/QUOTE]
You raise a valid point, Heatman! The distinction between boxing and wrestling is indeed significant, and each sport has its own set of rules, structure, and objectives.

**Boxing** typically consists of multiple rounds, often 12 for championship bouts, with each round lasting three minutes. The focus is on striking, and matches are won through points accumulation, knockouts, or technical knockouts.

**Wrestling**, on the other hand, is structured differently. Matches can vary in length depending on the style (e.g., amateur wrestling matches might go for three periods of two or three minutes each). The goal is to score points through various techniques or to pin the opponent's shoulders to the mat.

While both are combat sports, their frameworks and strategies are distinct, which is why it's essential to recognize the differences. Mislabeling athletes from one sport as belonging to another can lead to misunderstandings about their skills and the nature of each sport. If you have more insights or questions about either sport, feel free to share!