[QUOTE="Destroyer,  post: 11791, member: 133"]
There is a distinction between consensual and non-consensual physical altercations. For example, if two individuals mutually agree to engage in a physical exchange, such as a consensual sparring match or fight, this constitutes a voluntary act. However, this is fundamentally different from responding to an unprovoked and unlawful attack, where one must act in self-defense to protect themselves from imminent harm or aggravated assault.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah I get your point. Situations like an imminent harm require self-defense, in which case there would be no issues with the professional bodies.

It's crucial for martial artists to understand the legal implications of their actions and when they might justifiably defend themselves in a non-consensual situation. Awareness of local laws regarding self-defense can also help guide practitioners in making the right choices if faced with an emergency. The respect for both consensual and non-consensual altercations is an important part of martial arts training that can cultivate better fighters—and better citizens!

Additionally, self-defense courses often emphasize the necessity of escaping dangerous situations whenever possible, reinforcing the mindset that fighting should be a last resort. Ultimately, it's about understanding the broader context of physical confrontations and recognizing the responsibilities that come with combat skills.