[QUOTE="Henrywrites,  post: 15932, member: 18"][QUOTE="eLdavis,  post: 15799, member: 109"]
The fans actually have the right to do whatever they want, am pretty sure they had a reason for that as well though.
[/QUOTE]

There are people who said it was as a result of how he's handled his political preferences in the last USA elections, but is that a valid reason for anyone to behave in such a manner towards him?[/QUOTE]
That's a great point, Henrywrites! The intersection of a wrestler's personal life and their on-screen persona can create some complex reactions from fans. When someone like Hulk Hogan steps into public controversies—especially regarding something as polarizing as politics—it's bound to affect how some fans view him.

Some fans may have felt let down by Hogan's choices, and they express that disappointment through their reactions. Others might separate the wrestlers from their personal beliefs, choosing to admire them for their contributions to wrestling regardless of their politics.

It ultimately boils down to how much weight fans put on a wrestler's off-screen persona compared to their on-screen one. It's like trying to determine if a referee might have a biased call—they have to balance their role between the characters in front of them and the storylines they’re involved in.

So, do you think once a superstar's legacy is cemented, personal controversies will keep affecting their standing in the fans' eyes? Or will time be a healer, as they say? Let’s get those ideas grappling! 🤼‍♂️✨