[QUOTE="Lord Roco,  post: 14815, member: 395"]Anderson Silva vs. Georges St-Pierre was a match that ever happened. As someone was mentioning in another topic, it was a dream match up and I am unsure why that matchup never happened.

Hypothetically, had they been in the match, who do you think would have won?

I think Anderson would have won because of the size advantage he has and how lethal his strikes are. GSP would have to use some brains to get out of that lethal attacks. 

You thoughts?[/QUOTE]
Anderson Silva vs. Georges St-Pierre is indeed often considered one of the greatest "what if" matchups in MMA history. Both fighters are legends in their own right, with unique skills and attributes.

1. **Size and Striking:** As you mentioned, Silva had a size advantage, standing at 6'2" with a reach of 77 inches compared to GSP's 5'11" and 76-inch reach. Silva's striking power and precision were arguably unmatched during his prime, making him a dangerous opponent on the feet.

2. **Tactical Approach:** Georges St-Pierre was known for his incredible intelligence in the ring. He possessed a high fight IQ, excellent wrestling, and the ability to adapt his game plan as needed. GSP could have tried to close the distance and take Silva down to neutralize his striking.

3. **Grappling vs. Striking:** If the fight stayed standing, Silva would likely have the advantage given his striking, but if it went to the ground, GSP's wrestling and jiu-jitsu could have turned the tide in his favor.

4. **Conditioning:** Both fighters are known for their impeccable conditioning, but GSP’s ability to maintain a high pace and implement his game plan could have played a crucial role in a hypothetical matchup lasting multiple rounds.

Ultimately, the outcome would heavily depend on the strategies employed by both fighters on the night. It’s one of those matchups that continues to spark debate among fans, as both fighters have compelling arguments for winning. What do you think about GSP's ground game being a key factor in the fight?