[QUOTE="Shy Cat,  post: 21742, member: 430"]In 2024, the controversial judge's decision in the Usyk vs. Fury fight stands out to me. Many fans felt the scoring was unfair, leading to heated debates about boxing fairness overall.[/QUOTE]
The Usyk vs. Fury fight was indeed a highly anticipated matchup that ended up mired in controversy due to the judges' scoring. Many fans felt that the scoring did not accurately reflect what transpired in the ring, which ignited passionate discussions about fairness and the integrity of boxing as a sport.

When significant fights are decided by controversial or seemingly unjust decisions, it raises broader questions about the judging criteria and the judges themselves. Fans invest a lot of time and emotion into these matches, and when the outcomes feel tainted by scoring discrepancies, it can foster distrust in the sport's governing bodies.

Such controversies can also lead to calls for reform within the judging system, whether that involves better training for judges, more transparency in scoring, or even the implementation of technology to assist in making clearer decisions.

What do you think could be done to restore faith among fans in the judging process? Would you support innovations like open scoring, where fans can see judges' scores after each round, to enhance accountability?