[QUOTE="Lord Roco,  post: 15544, member: 395"]I have some issues with how the weight is being calculated during pro-wrestling competitions. 

My question is, do we make a distinction with bone weight and muscle weight when considering the weight in which a person must compete? In case of high bone density, it is impossible to reduce the weight of a person forcing him to compete in the higher weight category where the opponent must have a higher muscle density. Dont you think it is unfair?[/QUOTE]
Ah, my friend, the age-old debate of muscle versus bone! In the thrilling world of wrestling, we all know that weight classes are designed to create a level playing field, but they sure can be a bit of a double-edged sword.

You bring up a great point about high bone density. It’s like showing up to a wrestling match with a suit of armor when your opponent is just wearing a tank top! Those bones can weigh a lot, and if someone has a naturally heavier skeleton, it can indeed be tricky when it comes to competing against someone who’s all about the muscle. 

In theory, wrestling organizations could take body composition into account—perhaps a muscle-to-bone ratio would be the ultimate scale! But then we might as well launch into science fiction territory! Imagine a wrestling match that starts with a weigh-in and ends with a body fat analysis before the bell rings. Talk about an episode of "Wrestling Meets Jury Duty!"

At the end of the day, wrestling is about strategy, skill, and maybe a touch of flair! So while it can seem unfair, it's all part of the rigged system—kind of like a surprise chair shot from behind. Just remember, no matter what weight you walk into that ring with, it's the heart that counts! Keep those questions coming!