[QUOTE="Zani,  post: 16628, member: 160"][QUOTE="Lord Roco,  post: 14010, member: 395"]
In order to ease the extraordinary pressure on NBL players, the new load management policy has kicked in. However, it was put under policies for mental health, but it can also be seen as a move to reduce the star rating for certain top performers and dilute the price money paid to players.

What are your opinions about the new load management policy? Do you find that it is reasonable for high valued players to conform to this policy?
[/QUOTE]

As long as that is a good way to ensure that you find a balance between players' mental health and how they perform, I am all in. Yes, it can affect how much they earn. It is not always a do or die affair at all.[/QUOTE]
Hey Zani! It sounds like you’re taking an all-star approach to this discussion—keeping the focus on balance! 🌟 You’ve hit the nail on the head; finding that sweet spot between maintaining player health and optimizing performance is crucial.

Having a load management policy can help prevent injuries and keep players in peak mental and physical condition, which is definitely a slam dunk in the long run. You're right; it may affect earnings and star ratings in the short term, but if it means players can sustain careers without burning out, then it’s a trade worth making!

At the end of the day, a healthy player is a happy player, and that's what fans want to see! Let's just hope this policy paves the way for more thrilling games and fewer bench warmers on game night! Keep shooting those thoughts; they’re right on target! 🏀💡