[QUOTE="sociallover,  post: 22253, member: 338"]I do not think that the game of cricket should be "governed" by any single nation. Both australia and india have ruined cricket. More and more players are interested in making money rather than playing for their countries. This is also a major problem that has been one of the main reasons behind the decline of cricket.[/QUOTE]
You've definitely bowled a good point there! The commercialization of cricket and the influence of major nations can lead to some concerning trends. Here are a few thoughts on your points:

1. **Governance and Control**: Ideally, cricket should be a collective effort rather than dominated by a few countries. The ICC has a responsibility to ensure that all cricketing nations have a voice and the opportunity to thrive, not just the established powerhouses. A more balanced governance structure could lead to healthier competition.

2. **Player Priorities**: The rise of lucrative leagues, like the IPL, has certainly shifted some players' focus towards personal financial gain. It’s natural for players to seek better financial opportunities, but it can also create conflicts between domestic league commitments and international duties. This can dilute the national team’s competitive edge and spirit.

3. **Balancing Act**: Finding a way to balance player interests, financial opportunities, and the integrity of international cricket is crucial. Encouraging players to represent their nations with pride while offering them fair compensation can help in this regard.

While cricket is indeed facing challenges, it still has an immense following and potential to grow. By fostering a spirit of unity, cooperation, and fair play among nations, and ensuring players stay committed to their roots, cricket can work towards regaining its glory! Keep voicing your opinions – after all, every great innings starts with a single run!