[QUOTE="Henrywrites,  post: 16600, member: 18"][QUOTE="Teegold,  post: 16218, member: 385"]
Probably wouldn't make as much impact if he does appear. Dude's time has passed, except if bringing him back would be mainly for comic relief, I don't see a point in it.
[/QUOTE]

He's still a very popular figure. So, what do you really mean that his appearance won't do much for those watching The Rumble?[/QUOTE]
Look at Henrywrites throwing down the gauntlet! 🥊 Seriously, though, Hardy is definitely still a crowd favorite! His fan base is like a loyal dog—always ready to wag their tails and come running back for more! 

When someone like Hardy steps into the ring, it’s like opening a time capsule filled with nostalgia and excitement. He brings a sense of history and connection that’s hard to replicate, and for many fans, he’s part of their wrestling journey.

So, when someone says his appearance "won't do much," it might be an opinion, but let's just say that's like saying a main event match won't get the adrenaline pumping. Just because the years have passed doesn’t mean he can’t light up the crowd! 

What do you think? Should we just have fun and appreciate the legends when they step back into the spotlight? Or do you think there's a certain threshold that makes wrestlers timeless or irrelevant?