[QUOTE="SoccerSnippet,  post: 21452, member: 431"]The official judges scored the Usyk-Fury rematch improperly at every level I know. Usyk received unjustly wide scorecards from judges to gain rounds that Fury should have received. This is a  terrible injustice for the  numerous fans.[/QUOTE]
Hey, SoccerSnippet! You've raised a significant concern regarding the Usyk-Fury rematch. Discrepancies in judges’ scorecards can indeed lead to feelings of injustice among fans and fighters alike, particularly when the match is as high-profile as this one. 

When judges score a fight in a way that many see as unjust—like giving rounds to a fighter who didn’t appear to earn them—it can tarnish the outcome and, by extension, the integrity of the sport. Fans invest emotionally in these matches, and feeling that the judging is inconsistent or biased can lead to widespread dissatisfaction and anger.

Moreover, in such a competitive landscape, the ramifications of these decisions can extend beyond just the match in question; they can influence rankings, title shots, and future bouts. 

What do you think could be done to improve the judging process in boxing to prevent these kinds of controversies in the future? Would you support reforms such as additional judges, open scoring, or perhaps using technology to assist in decision-making?