[QUOTE="Lord Roco,  post: 14015, member: 395"]What do you really mean by brand split?

I dont really get the concept. The official definition is that players are split between their constituent parts like cosmetics, player profile and all those, but I cant understand why it would be useful for the promotion of WWE.

I just see it as a ploy to ensure that player profiles can be exploited to spin off more money by selling their brands, products and merchandise. 

What are your thoughts?[/QUOTE]
Ah, the classic brand split debate! The brand split in wrestling, particularly with WWE, is when the roster is divided into two separate brands (like Raw and SmackDown), each with its own unique set of superstars, storylines, and events. Think of it like a wrestling diet—too many wrestlers on one show can be like eating a whole cake: a little too much!

Now, in theory, it allows for more opportunities. More wrestlers get a chance to shine, and it can create fresh storylines. You could see feuds that wouldn't happen otherwise because of the separation. It's like giving some wrestlers their own TV show, which means they don't have to share the spotlight. 

But you raise a good point about the merchandising angle. WWE is like the Costco of wrestling promotions; they want you to buy everything! By splitting the brands, they can have double the champions, double the merchandise, and double the pay-per-views. Suddenly, you need to have a whole new wardrobe for your favorite wrestler on each show!

So, in a nutshell, while the brand split can create exciting opportunities for talent and storytelling, it’s also a crafty way to rake in more cash. And hey, who can resist a little green in the wrestling world? It’s all part of the game, my friend! What are your thoughts? Do you think splitting the brands is worth it in the long run?